Sex differences in the relationship between hepatic steatosis, mood and anxiety disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), alcoholic liver disease (ALD), mental symptoms (mood, anxiety disorders and distress) by sex. METHODS: This a cross-sectional study performed in working-age adults from a Health Promotion Center (primary care) in São Paulo, Brazil. Self-reported mental symptoms from rating scales (21-item Beck Anxiety Inventory, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and K6 distress scale) were evaluated by hepatic steatosis (NAFLD and ALD). Logistic regression models estimated the association between hepatic steatosis subtypes and mental symptoms by Odds ratios (OR) adjusted by confounders in the total sample and sex stratified. RESULTS: Among 7241 participants (70.5% men, median age: 45 years), the frequency of steatosis was of 30.7% (25.1% NAFLD), being higher in men than women (70.5% vs. 29.5%, p < 0.0001), regardless of the steatosis subtype. Metabolic risk factors were similar in both subtypes of steatosis, but not mental symptoms. Overall, NAFLD was inversely associated with anxiety (OR = 0.75, 95%CI 0.63-0.90) and positively associated with depression (OR = 1.17, 95%CI 1.00-1.38). On the other hand, ALD was positively associated with anxiety (OR = 1.51; 95%CI 1.15-2.00). In sex-stratified analyses, only men presented an association of anxiety symptoms with NAFLD (OR = 0.73; 95%CI 0.60-0.89) and ALD (OR = 1.60; 95%CI 1.18-2.16). CONCLUSIONS: The complex association between different types of steatosis (NAFLD and ALD), mood and anxiety disorders indicates the need for a deeper understanding of their common causal pathways.

Neck circumference as a marker of body adiposity in young to middle-aged adults.

OBJECTIVE: Neck circumference (NC) is a straightforward method for quantifying upper body adiposity without the limitations that other indices can have. Thus, this study aimed to analyze the relationship between NC, overall (body mass index [BMI]) and central obesity (waist circumference [WC]), and percentage of body fat (BF%) in men and women. METHODS: The associations with NC quartiles (first quartile: reference group), BMI ≥30 kg/m2, WC (>102 cm for men and >88 cm for women), and high BF% (≥21 for men and ≥29 for women) were compared and analyzed by logistic regression models adjusted for demographic characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, and lean mass. RESULTS: In 4283 adults (mean age: 44 y, 71.8% of men), the mean NC was higher in men (40.5 cm, range: 32-55 cm) than women (34.5 cm, range: 28.5-46 cm). Among men, the fourth quartile of NC (42.5-55 cm) was positively associated with obesity (multivariable odds ratio [OR]: 2.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-4.48). Among women, the fourth quartile of NC (36.5-46 cm) was associated with increased WC (multivariable OR: 2.98; 95% CI: 1.59-5.60). Progressive increases in the ORs were noticed across the associations between NC quartiles (second to fourth) and high BF% in men and women. The highest ORs were observed for the associations between high BF% and the fourth quartiles of NC in men (multivariable OR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.49-3.93) and in women (multivariable OR: 29.19; 95% CI: 14.01-60.84). CONCLUSIONS: The utility of NC as a measurement of obesity in clinical practice was demonstrated in this large sample of young to middle-aged adults. The highest NC values were positively associated with overall obesity in men and central obesity in women. Moreover, NC was closely associated with high BF% in both sexes, particularly in women.

Anxiety, Depression, and Anger in Bruxism: A Cross-sectional Study among Adult Attendees of a Preventive Center.

The relationship between emotional symptom and bruxism is not well-established. We aimed to investigate sleeping bruxism and psychological factors. A cross-sectional study was performed in working-age adults attended in general outpatient service. The main outcome was the sleep bruxism diagnosed by dentist. Sociodemographic, clinical and psychological characteristics were evaluated according to sleep bruxism (yes/no). Scores of self-report scales of psychological symptoms (Beck Anxiety Inventory, Patient Health Questionnaire, and Dimensions of Anger Reactions) were individually subjected to factor analysis, through the extraction method of principal axis factoring. The associations between probable cases of sleep bruxism with dimensions of anxiety (somatic and cognitive), depression, and anger were estimated by linear regression models. Linear regression models (with ß coefficients and 95% CI) were adjusted for sociodemographic covariates. Among 351 respondents, 37.3% presented sleep bruxism. Of them, high frequencies of symptoms of anger (68.1%), moderate-severe anxiety (23.6%), and depression (17.9%) were observed. After adjustment, somatic-anxiety (ß: 0,136; CI95%: 0,028 to 0.276) was associated with sleep bruxism, but not cognitive-anxiety, depression or anger. The presence of sleeping bruxism should be routinely explored among adults, regarding its relationship with emotional symptoms.

Dimensions of Anger Reactions (DAR-5): a useful screening tool for anger in the general population.

BACKGROUND: Dimensions of Anger Reactions (DAR-5) is a brief 5-item instrument to assess experience of anger. We aimed to verify the DAR-5 as a screening instrument in the community. METHODS: A sample of 368 apparently healthy adults who attended an outpatient ambulatory facility self-reported on the DAR-5 scale, the Spielberger's State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI), the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Indicators of reliability and validity were calculated to demonstrate the performance of the DAR-5. RESULTS: According to the DAR-5, around half the respondents found themselves becoming angry with people or situations and reported persistent duration of anger. Antagonism towards others was the least frequently experienced anger (8.4%). The DAR-5 was found to be reliable and stable, showing a significant correlation with the BAI and PHQ-9 for both sexes. In confirmatory factor analysis, a one-dimensional structure of anger experience was demonstrated through salient fit statistics. A cut-off > 8 was the best threshold against STAXI for discriminating cases of anger, irrespective of sex. CONCLUSIONS: The shortness of the DAR-5, along with its cost-effective applicability, qualifies this measuring tool as a useful instrument for inclusion in the routine assessment of anger reactions in the general population.Key pointsThis is the first time the validity of DAR-5 has been demonstrated in a developing country.The Portuguese version of DAR-5 has appropriate sensitivity and high specificity.The DAR-5 demonstrated to be a reliable and stable instrument, irrespective of sex.

Combination of amlodipine and enalapril in hypertensive patients with coronary disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients (pts) with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) can benefit from a decrease in the blood pressure (BP), according to recent studies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the fixed combination: amlodipine + enalapril, when compared to amlodipine in the normalization of the diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) (<85 mmHg), in pts with CAD and systemic arterial hypertension (SAH). METHODS: Double-blind and randomized study, with two groups of pts with DAP > or =90 and <110 mmHg and CAD. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40%, symptoms of heart failure or angina class III and IV, severe diseases and DAP > or =110 mmHg during the four-week wash-out with atenolol treatment alone, were excluded. After the wash-out, pts were randomly distributed for the use of the combination (A) or amlodipine (B) and were followed every four weeks up to 98 days. The initial doses (in mg) were, respectively: A- 2.5/10 and B- 2.5; the doses were increased when DAP > 85mmHg, at the visits. Statistical analysis was carried out with chi2, Fischer and analysis of variance, for p< 0.05. RESULTS: Of the 110 selected pts, 72 (A= 32, B= 40) were randomized. The decreases in DAP and systolic arterial pressure (SAP) were significant (p< 0.01), but with no difference between the groups in mmHg: SAP, A (127.7 +/- 13.4) and B (125.3 +/- 12.6) (p= 0.45) and DAP, A (74.5 +/- 6.7 mmHg) and B (75.5 +/- 6.7 mmHg) (p= 0.32). Group A presented a lower incidence of lower-limb edema: (7.1% vs 30.6%, p=0.02) on the 98th day of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The fixed combination of enalapril and amlodipine, as well as isolated amlodipine, was effective in the normalization of BP in pts with CAD and SAH stages I and II, adding blockage of the renin-angiotensin system.

Combinação de anlodipino e enalaprila em pacientes hipertensos com doença coronariana / Combination of amlodipine and enalapril in hypertensive patients with coronary disease / Combinación de amlodipino y enalapril en pacientes hipertensos con enfermedad coronaria

FUNDAMENTO: Pacientes (pts) com doença coronariana (DAC) estável podem se beneficiar de menor pressão arterial (PA), conforme estudos recentes. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a eficácia e a tolerabilidade da combinação fixa anlodipino + enalaprila, comparada a anlodipino na normalização da PA diastólica (PAD) (< 85 mmHg), em pts com DAC e HAS. MÉTODOS: Estudo duplo-cego, randomizado, com dois grupos de pts com PAD > 90 e <110 mmHg e DAC. Excluímos os com FEVE < 40%; sintomas de insuficiência cardíaca ou angina classe III e IV; doenças graves e PAD > 110 mmHg durante o wash-out de quatro semanas, em uso só de atenolol. Após wash-out randomizamos para combinação (A) ou anlodipino (B) e seguimos de quatro em quatro semanas até 98 dias. As doses (mg) iniciais foram, respectivamente: A- 2,5/10 e B- 2,5, sendo incrementadas se PAD> 85mmHg, nas visitas. Estatística com χ2, Fischer e análise de variância, para p< 0,05. RESULTADOS:de 110 pts selecionados, randomizamos 72 (A= 32, B= 40). As reduções da PAD e da PA sistólica (PAS) foram intensas (p< 0,01), mas sem diferenças entre os grupos em mmHg: PAS, A (127,7 ± 13,4) e B (125,3 ± 12,6) (p= 0,45) e PAD, A (74,5 ± 6,7 mmHg) e B (75,5 ± 6,7 mmHg) (p= 0,32). Houve menos edema de membros inferiores no A (7,1% vs 30,6%, p=0,02) no 98º dia. CONCLUSÃO: A combinação fixa de enalaprila com anlodipino, tal qual anlodipino isolado, em pts com DAC e HAS estágios I e II foi eficaz na normalização da pressão, adicionando bloqueio ao sistema renina-angiotensina.

BACKGROUND: Patients (pts) with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) can benefit from a decrease in the blood pressure (BP), according to recent studies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the fixed combination: amlodipine + enalapril, when compared to amlodipine in the normalization of the diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) (<85 mmHg), in pts with CAD and systemic arterial hypertension (SAH). METHODS: Double-blind and randomized study, with two groups of pts with DAP >90 and <110 mmHg and CAD. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40%, symptoms of heart failure or angina class III and IV, severe diseases and DAP >110 mmHg during the four-week wash-out with atenolol treatment alone, were excluded. After the wash-out, pts were randomly distributed for the use of the combination (A) or amlodipine (B) and were followed every four weeks up to 98 days. The initial doses (in mg) were, respectively: A- 2.5/10 and B- 2.5; the doses were increased when DAP > 85mmHg, at the visits. Statistical analysis was carried out with χ2, Fischer and analysis of variance, for p< 0.05. RESULTS: Of the 110 selected pts, 72 (A= 32, B= 40) were randomized. The decreases in DAP and systolic arterial pressure (SAP) were significant (p< 0.01), but with no difference between the groups in mmHg: SAP, A (127.7 ± 13.4) and B (125.3 ± 12.6) (p= 0.45) and DAP, A (74.5 ± 6.7 mmHg) and B (75.5 ± 6.7 mmHg) (p= 0.32). Group A presented a lower incidence of lower-limb edema: (7.1% vs 30.6%, p=0.02) on the 98th day of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The fixed combination of enalapril and amlodipine, as well as isolated amlodipine, was effective in the normalization of BP in pts with CAD and SAH stages I and II, adding blockage of the renin-angiotensin system.

FUNDAMENTO: Pacientes (pts) con enfermedad coronaria (EAC) estable pueden beneficiarse con una menor presión arterial (PA), de acuerdo con estudios recientes. OBJETIVO: Evaluar la eficacia y la tolerancia de la combinación fija amlodipino + enalapril, comparada a el amlodipino en la normalización de la PA diastólica (PAD) (< 85 mmHg), en pts con EAC y HAS. MÉTODOS: Estudio doble ciego, randomizado, con dos grupos de pts con PAD >90 y <110 mmHg y EAC. Excluimos a los pts con FEVI < 40%; síntomas de insuficiencia cardiaca o angina clase III y IV; enfermedades graves y PAD >110 mmHg durante el wash-out de cuatro semanas, en uso sólo de atenolol. Después del wash-out randomizamos para combinación (A) o amlopidino (B) y seguimos de cuatro en cuatro semanas hasta 98 días. Las dosis (mg) iniciales fueron, respectivamente: A- 2,5/10 y B- 2,5, siendo incrementadas si PAD> 85mmHg, en las visitas. Estadística con χ2, Fischer y análisis de varianza, para p< 0,05. RESULTADOS: De un total de 110 pts seleccionados, randomizamos a 72 (A= 32, B= 40). Las reducción de la PAD y de la PA sistólica (PAS) fueron intensas (p< 0,01), pero sin diferencias entre los grupos en mmHg: PAS, A (127,7 ± 13,4) y B (125,3 ± 12,6) (p= 0,45) y PAD, A (74,5 ± 6,7 mmHg) y B (75,5 ± 6,7 mmHg) (p= 0,32). Se registró menos edema de miembros inferiores en el A (7,1 por ciento vs 30,6%, p=0,02) en el 98º día. CONCLUSIÓN: La combinación fija de enalapril con amlodipino, tal como el amlodipino aislado, en pts con EAC y HAS estadios I y II fue eficaz en la normalización de la presión, agregando un bloqueo al sistema renina-angiotensina.

Transmyocardial laser revascularization plus cell therapy for refractory angina.

We report that the use of transmyocardial laser revascularization combined with intramyocardial injection is a therapeutic option for patients with severe ischemic heart disease (IHD) not amenable to conventional myocardial revascularization. Recently, cell therapy with autologous bone marrow cells (BMC) has been tested in clinical trials for severe IHD. We tested the hypothesis that TMLR combined with intramyocardial injection of BMC is safe, and may help increase the functional capacity and myocardial perfusion in patients with refractory angina. We enrolled 8 patients (7 men), 64+/-4 years old, with refractory angina, non-candidates for another procedure. TMLR (8+/-2 laser drills) was performed via a limited thoracotomy. BMC were obtained prior to surgery, and the lymphomonocytic fraction was separated by density gradient centrifugation. During surgery, 5 mL containing approximately 1.6+/-0.2 x 10(8) BMC (CD34+=1.7+/-0.4%) was delivered by multiple injections in the ischemic myocardium. We observed a reduction in the ischemic score as assessed by MRI from 1.56+/-0.09 (B) to 0.93+/-0.10 (6M) (P=0.01), as well as a reduction in functional class of angina from 3.6+/-0.2 (B) to 1.4+/-0.2 (6M) (P<0.0001). We concluded that, in this early experience, the combined strategy of TMLR plus cell therapy appeared to be safe, and may have synergistically acted to reduce myocardial ischemia, with clinically relevant improvement in functional capacity.